Erasmus, FCD
Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ July 22 2013,22:10) | Ah ha!
Since it takes 1 cycle for the spin sensor to sense being in a spin its being 1 cycle back made that sensor barely useful anymore, and I'm apparently seeing it making the best of what little sense that leaves it with (when it was seeing nothing at all). Making the Spin sensor act without delay improved things, no longer favored one lobe, by leaving the spinning direction more to the other. But that reduced how well it did with optimum timing, which is the fastest learner of them all, and did better with delayed Spin that takes a full cycle of motor torque (one lobe timestep followed by other's timestep) to be considered spinning.
All did well staying fed, within a few pixels of each other at almost 100% full at all times. It helps to be at optimal hold time (less than 1/2 cycle for sensory to reach memory address in and write) but still works with a long delay.
I'm not sure how that might apply to motor neuron delays, but that's what happens in this model, from not being optimal speed with memory. |
no one gives a fuck, fool
Let us know when this shit gets published somewhere
no, i don't mean Video Gaming Semi-Decadal Reviews or Dispatches from the Round Room either
--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK
Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG
the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat
I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles
|
