Soapy Sam
Posts: 659 Joined: Jan. 2012
|
Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 29 2013,00:38) | Quote (Soapy Sam @ Jan. 28 2013,15:51) | Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 28 2013,17:33) | Quote (Soapy Sam @ Jan. 15 2013,19:27) | Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 13 2013,00:10) | Quote (Soapy Sam @ Jan. 09 2013,04:43) | Joe, on the 'WJM - atheists are dishonest, thick and/or irrational' thread Quote | I know how to test Intelligent Design evolution. And no one appears to know how to test blind watchmaker evolution.
Strange, that… |
Care to reveal your methodology? |
Already have- more than once, too.
How to test and falsify ID |
That's bullshit, Joe. Dembski's Explanatory Filter - Newton's First Rule, for that matter - are no help to you here. You don't 'test ID' by attempting to demonstrate 'blind and undirected processes' doing evolution, regardless whether that attempt succeeds or fails.
You need a method of reliably distinguishing ID causes from 'natural' ones in biological history. You haven't got one. |
Fuck you soapy sam. Your position doesn't have any methodology beyond "it ain't designed no matter what!" |
Fuck yourself, old bean. You think that is all evolutionary theory amounts to, so you will forever rail helplessly against it, with your convincing counterargument: "it is, I tells ya". |
Whatever asshole. It's a fact that you cannot produce any positive evidence tat accumulations of genetic accidents didit. |
Did what? What is your evidence that a designer did "it"? Are we back to the Explanatory Filter again?
-------------- SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G
BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington
|