Joe G
Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007
|
| Quote (Richardthughes @ Jan. 15 2013,19:45) | | Quote (Soapy Sam @ Jan. 15 2013,19:27) | | Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 13 2013,00:10) | | Quote (Soapy Sam @ Jan. 09 2013,04:43) | Joe, on the 'WJM - atheists are dishonest, thick and/or irrational' thread
| Quote | I know how to test Intelligent Design evolution. And no one appears to know how to test blind watchmaker evolution.
Strange, that… |
Care to reveal your methodology? |
Already have- more than once, too.
How to test and falsify ID |
That's bullshit, Joe. Dembski's Explanatory Filter - Newton's First Rule, for that matter - are no help to you here. You don't 'test ID' by attempting to demonstrate 'blind and undirected processes' doing evolution, regardless whether that attempt succeeds or fails.
You need a method of reliably distinguishing ID causes from 'natural' ones in biological history. You haven't got one. |
And *suprise!* - ID is just a negative argument. |
ID is just a negative argument in the minds of the willfully ignorant, like Richie.
The way I described the methodology involves a positive aspect also. Just as Newton said.
--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth
"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton
Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code- Â Acartia bogart, TARD
YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism
|
