OgreMkV
Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 03 2012,08:23) | | Quote (OgreMkV @ Dec. 03 2012,07:57) | | When one (meaning you Gary) defines "intelligence" to mean "any activity" (including reacting with another molecule or atom and bacterial responses to the environment), then it's not US who have the issues with standard definitions. |
Needing to be dishonest about what is actually stated in the theory is another symptom of the problem, or trolling.
Since I don't have time to again go over the common/popular cognitive models the operational definition covers (as I already well enough did in the thread with my name on it) I'm off to my day job, again. |
When you talk about intelligent molecules... whatever.
And developing correct graphs isn't one of things that you take care of whenever. That's one of the fundamentals of proper science communication... oh wait, I think I understand the problem.
--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.
http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat
|
