Richardthughes
Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
| Quote (olegt @ Oct. 14 2012,20:57) | | Quote (Joe G @ Oct. 14 2012,20:54) | There is only one superset in a nested hierarchy, ie only one set that consists of and contains ALL other sets.
Now you may take issue to that usage but that is your problem, not mine.
The fact remains in a nested hierarchy there is only one set that consists of and conatins ALL of the other (sub)sets. So that would be "the" superset. Duh. |
Wrong answer, Joe. {1,2} is a superset. How do we know that? Because {1} and {2} are its subsets. So {1,2} is a superset of {1} and of {2}.
LOL |
50/50 fail. I think I call that the universal tard boundary. Well done Joe! You've passed the tard inference!
--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine
|
