RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 19 2012,09:27   

Quote
You withdrew because the observed physical entailments of information transfer is beyond even a conceptual unguided process, and you know it.


Perhaps he will offer to debate Szostak on this. Or any of a number of people working on OOL.

But in a world where Tiktaalik can be dismissed as not a transitional, just asserting the impossibility of chemical evolution counts as evidence.

But it's obvious that UPB's "logic" has been shreded, and the only element of his argument left is incredulity.

edit for typo

Edited by midwifetoad on Aug. 19 2012,09:30

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]