stevestory
Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
RM, here's a hypothetical situation. Say there's a technical dispute which is full of jargon and yeah, it's just one of those things where you need some advanced understanding of several technical fields to evaluate the arguments yourself. And say you find out that side A consists of 99% of the experts, and they're publishing 10,000 papers a year on the details of the topic, and side B consists of 1% of the experts, and they publish no papers at all, they just say the other side's got it all wrong.
Imagine that's all you know about the debate. What's your opinion of the situation?
|
