RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
BillB



Posts: 388
Joined: Aug. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 07 2012,02:28   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Aug. 07 2012,00:11)
Also, where did ID say junk DNA had a function.  The earliest mention that I can find of ID saying anything about junk DNA having a function is Behe in 1996.

Of course, Gould had been saying that since 1978.  So I'm not real sure why ID can even make the claim.

And on what basis - because 'it doesn't make sense' - sounds like a nice sciency hypothesis.

Human designers include junk in designs, either by blind copying of errors or depreciated functional elements, or to deliberately obfuscate attempts to back engineer - so if you want to draw analogies from known designers then you have to conclude that sometimes including junk in a design makes sense.

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]