RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Freddie



Posts: 371
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: July 25 2012,11:05   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ July 25 2012,08:39)
Gordon Mullins says rather more then I suspect he might have wanted to:
   
Quote
it hardly matters if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand by default.

Got you Gordo.
it hardly matters if there are even critical flaws in Behe's work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand by default.
it hardly matters if there are even critical flaws in Dembski's work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand by default.

 
Quote
IP, I have to go now. In recent days, PM’s noview has been seriously addressed, especially at ENV, with several related threads at UD. This is just one of them. Remember, “every tub must stand on its own bottom,” and if the evo mat narrative of OOL and OO body plans including our own cannot do that, it hardly matters if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand by default. I will, DV, be back later, I have a mission- critical issue to help a client address and have already taken more time than I should from it. KF




Edited to make the image a bit smallerer !

--------------
Joe: Most criticisims of ID stem from ignorance and jealousy.
Joe: As for the authors of the books in the Bible, well the OT was authored by Moses and the NT was authored by various people.
Byers: The eskimo would not need hairy hair growth as hair, I say, is for keeping people dry. Not warm.

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]