Erasmus, FCD
Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007
|
| Quote (JohnW @ Mar. 20 2012,12:34) | | Quote (OgreMkV @ Mar. 20 2012,07:09) | I think I prefer the ganging up on Newspaper comment threads. That sounds like fun.
Hitting blogs is just jumping head first into the smelly shit.
These clowns are absolute crackpots. We could probably do a 1000 words on every sentence. And no one would read it... ever. |
What made UD so entertaining was the veneer of pretending to do science. Street-corner preaching is all over teh webz, but street-corner preaching in a labcoat... |
agreed. sciency-ness is critical for producing good tard. if you just have some jackass running his mouth about what he chooses to believe and doesn't give a shit about contraindicating evidence (WJM, for instance) then you produce far far fewer LULZ per electron
UD pretended to use sciency-ness as a cover for their apologetics. it isn't hard to find other groups who do that to varying degrees but ultimately i think they all place more value on apologetics than they do sciency-ness. the fun is in exposing that.
news paper comments, are you kidding? the newspapers i follow in places i have lived are utter cesspools and prayer gutters, might be fun for pure trolling but you are not going to get meaningful dialogue casting to those swine
--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK
Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG
the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat
I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles
|
