dvunkannon
Posts: 1377
Joined: June 2008
|
| Quote (Seversky @ Jan. 22 2012,18:06) | | Quote (Soapy Sam @ Jan. 22 2012,04:53) | Greetings, earthlings.
Let it be known that what is and isn't observable, by definitional fiat, must on that grounds alone (and with clear regard to the hidden agendas of those who would hoodwink us to think otherwise) be dismissed as beyond the remit of a priori materialistic investigation. This is verified as true by the massively empirically confirmed and warranted operation of design in the observable here-and-now. 500+ bits of dFCSI cannot be produced by stochastic means, though you can get a shave and a haircut for 2.
And BTW ID is not anti-evohlution. Just me. Liar. No, you're a liar.
Sorry, just coming up for air! |
You can't fool me. You're really StephenB, aren't you? |
I was just about to post, wondering what had happened to the Sultan of Smarm, Altar Boy to Clive Hayden, our StephenB. I'm not reading UD regularly enough to see if he is still up to his wacky hijinx over there, but reading here I don't see as many howls of outrage/bellylaughs over his pronouncements as I used to. Is he still posting there or has he
a) graduated
b) started to get laid
Enquiring minds could care less.
--------------
I’m referring to evolution, not changes in allele frequencies. - Cornelius Hunter
I’m not an evolutionist, I’m a change in allele frequentist! - Nakashima
|
