Kristine
Posts: 3061 Joined: Sep. 2006
|
Quote (Woodbine @ Jan. 17 2012,14:18) | Enjoy an example of Upright Biped's integrity...
Febble says... Quote | IDists have failed to demonstrate that what they consider the signature of intentional design is not also the signature of Darwinian evolutionary processes. |
Upright Biped helpfully paraphrases... Quote | No IDist is able to demonstrating what he/she thinks is the signature of design, which isn’t also the signature of Darwinian processes. |
....and starts huffing and puffing. Quote | The fact that you [Elizabeth] seize upon the PROFOUND difference between those two only reaffirms my charaterization of you as dishonest. |
Elizabeth promptly squashes the slimy bastard. |
May I say that it is also simply a pleasure to read her? She writes very well. For all of the UDudes purported purpose and design, their sentences do not sing. Their sentences mumble; their arguments slouch. Kaplan consultants could not save those guys.
-------------- Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?
AtBC Poet Laureate
"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive
"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr
|