RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 17 2012,15:37   

Quote (Woodbine @ Jan. 17 2012,14:18)
Enjoy an example of Upright Biped's integrity...

Febble says...
   
Quote
IDists have failed to demonstrate that what they consider the signature of intentional design is not also the signature of Darwinian evolutionary processes.

Upright Biped helpfully paraphrases...
   
Quote
No IDist is able to demonstrating what he/she thinks is the signature of design, which isn’t also the signature of Darwinian processes.

....and starts huffing and puffing.
   
Quote
The fact that you [Elizabeth] seize upon the PROFOUND difference between those two only reaffirms my charaterization of you as dishonest.

:D

Elizabeth promptly  squashes the slimy bastard.

May I say that it is also simply a pleasure to read her? She writes very well. For all of the UDudes purported purpose and design, their sentences do not sing. Their sentences mumble; their arguments slouch. Kaplan consultants could not save those guys.

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]