RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 10 2012,10:08   

Quote (OgreMkV @ Jan. 10 2012,10:03)
Quote (Kattarina98 @ Jan. 10 2012,09:59)
 
Quote (OgreMkV @ Jan. 10 2012,09:13)
Joe's comment on that is so funny.  

EVERY paper supports ID, if only 'scientists' could see it like us ID-proponents do (i.e. with complete misunderstanding).

Every now and then, Joe surprises me with a brainwave - well, sort of. He seems to have realised that there was something terribly wrong with Denews' so-called "milestone".

Realizing something is wrong and correctly identifying the wrong bit are two entirely different skills.

Great fun - is has dawned on DeNews that the milestone is just a hole in the ground. So she hurries to open a new thread to put things right.
Quote
Having been on this beat for a decade now, I can safely say that no one who is not involved can have any idea how difficult an achievement that is, in the face of a corrupt, tenured establishment that is unashamed to use outright suppression.
...
As for the next decade, with luck, we are reaching the point where it’s safe to test design hypotheses, in the sense that many might fail and a few succeed. That’s the usual way with any endeavour in science, of course. But in a corrupt environment, success means hewing the party line and failure means departing from it. So rational analysis will remain impossible in many venues.


--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]