RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2011,07:42   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ Dec. 15 2011,00:39)
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Dec. 14 2011,21:20)
Bully Arrington gets his dander up when DrREC won't give the answer Bully wants;

   
Quote
Bully: "DrREC, I will ask the question one more time. If you evade it again, I suppose the answer will be clear enough. If your opponent were dealt ten straight flushes in a row would you make a design inference?


If you had never seen a card game before, had no idea what poker is, didn't know what the markings on the cards meant or how many combinations are possible,  didn't know what the relative value of any particular combination was, the answer is NO.

oh yes please do invite them to talk about contingencies imposed upon scientific explanation by the idiosyncracies of language and culture.  that'd be really fucking rich

if it don't read the same in japanese or !Kung it ain't fucking math sweetheart

This!

Of course, I both understood E. and realized he made an excellent point...

I need a glass of wine and some quiet reflection on where my life has gone wrong.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]