forastero
Posts: 458
Joined: Oct. 2011
|
| Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 17 2011,23:27) | Here's the deal for, you have to explain everything that we have talked about and do so in an internally consistent way without resorting to miracles and you have to do it in such a way that can be observed.
EVERYTHING we have talked about in this thread is explained by the way we look at the world through science. Further, that same science makes predictions that have been verified (some of them) for several hundred years.
The Big Bang theory makes a prediction that is confirmed in two separate, independent experiments.
Radiometric dating is confirmed because, very simply, every valid test run on the same sample of rock, gives the same age. These methods are independent. If there were some fundamental difference, then the date would not correlate. Further, these dates are supported by other means.
You cannot get around this simple fact. You can hack away with your technobabble for years and it won't make any difference. What are your notions that explain EVERYTHING we have talked about?
Why are you scared to present those notions to the same level of scrutiny that you subject to ours? (None of which is new BTW.) |
Practice what you preach and quit yall's pantheistic creationism with all its mystical mutationology, radiomagic wands, crystal ball chronologies, and ape animisms to study some season of the niche spaghetti monsters made outa of a fountain of soup and cosmic rays from the heavens
|
