forastero
Posts: 458
Joined: Oct. 2011
|
| Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Nov. 09 2011,23:09) | Given that, does the Wikipedia article you cite support your belief in a mythical flood with its attendant antediluvian and post-flood eco-zones, or does it not support the rejection of your imaginary chronology and, in large measure, support the standard chronology, even granting a contraction of the entire timeline by 0.5 percent?
2) When was the flood? An order of magnitude will do. Hundreds of years in the past? Thousands? Tens of Thousands? etc.
You've made some assertions about geological eras relative to that flood, e.g. horseshit vis ante and post-diluvian "eco-zones."
But you seem only able to muster the cowardice of your convictions, in that you just can't bring yourself to state your belief regarding just when that flood occurred even in the most approximate terms.
Absent the stones to venture some estimate regarding that date, your assertions are completely empty - joining other of your claims for events in eras you don't believe to have occurred.
In your silence, you've betrayed your convictions thrice before the cock crowed. So sack up, Oh Mighty Caged Kong: when did the flood occur? |
Wikipedia has a radical liberal bias
I answered honestly the question about the date of the Flood when I said no human really knows until he gets to heaven. Its and inhouse debate but I feel most of the evidence that I have provided reveals a fairly young earth and probably under 20,000 years old
You are forgetting that much of the megafauna and life in general life was devastated by demonically influenced men or Nephilim but God would however miraculously preserve them for us as fossils
|
