BillB
Posts: 388
Joined: Aug. 2009
|
| Quote (Richardthughes @ Nov. 02 2011,17:20) | | Quote (Patrick @ Nov. 02 2011,10:16) | Lizzie explains a basic flaw in kairosfocus' argument:
| Quote | Dr Liddle:
Perhaps, it has not been recognised by you that once the alphabet is discrete state, it is perforce digital?
|
| Quote | No, it has not been recognised by me, kf, because it is not true. “Discrete” does not mean the same as “digital”. Letters as used in words are discrete, that does not mean they are digital.
|
This is even better than the Weasel latching debate because there is absolutely no wiggle room for kairosfocus. He is purely, simply, clearly wrong.
Now, since rule number one in his mind is that kairosfocus is never wrong and therefore will never admit error, what might we expect as a response? Could this be the aneurysm trigger or is he immune to cognitive dissonance after all this time of living with it? |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......Digital
| Quote | | A digital system[1] is a data technology that uses discrete (discontinuous) values. |
QED, Mullings, you tiresome bore. |
DrBot bitchslaps KF: | Quote | | Quote | Dr Bot:
You have some fairly serious explaining to do on another thread. |
No I don’t. But I believe you do. I’m getting a bit fed up of the way you preach at and bully others simply because they disagree with you – and quite often people who have considerably more expertise than you.
As for digital logic – it is quite clear that you failed to understand my point. The more I see your posts, riddled with grand claims backed up by no evidence and followed up by bullying attacks on others, the more I am inclined to think … Dunning Kruger.
Please put a sock in your uncivilized behavior and try treating others as you expect to be treated. (Except of course you seem to expect others to treat you as an infallible source of knowledge and truth, which is a bit of a problem considering you are so often wrong)
|
|
