forastero
Posts: 458
Joined: Oct. 2011
|
| Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Oct. 25 2011,06:13) | | Quote (forastero @ Oct. 25 2011,06:07) | | Again, as soon as one of ya explain to me whats currently accepted |
Sigh. Perhaps you should read this:
http://www.amazon.com/Greates....&sr=1-4
So, here's what is currently accepted: The origin of species that we observe around us has no telic input whatsoever. Unguided evolution is the origin of biological diversity.
A specific example: Yanoconodon allini shows a transition between modern mammals and their distant ancestors which illustrates a transitional structure in the long process of evolution of mammal ears.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article....-action
Evolution explains the origin of mammalian ears via a series of such data points.
How does ID explain the origin of mammalian ears? |
I doubt if there are any blind watch makers and genes are not really selfish
And your second link is just more pseudoempiricism and circular reasoning. I mean, to resurrect so called ancestral genes, y’all are implementing modern evolutionism to infer so called primordial evolution in order to infer modern evolutionism. Plus, no small mutations are known to fine-tune anything, especially these hopeful monsters
In all honesty articles like these just sadden me because they only prove to me how desperately lost so many of you really are.
|
