lkeithlu
Posts: 321
Joined: Feb. 2006
|
Long post from kairosfocus:
16
kairosfocus
04/21/2011
7:32 am
KL:
I am afraid you are playing at turnabout challenge, burden of proof shifting, and defaulting on a prioris to evo mat; again.
(snip)
So, KL, it is time for you to now show by writing out a true and fair summary that you understand what we are saying, and that you have moved beyond setting up, sliming and knocking over rhetorically convenient strawman opponents.
Then, you can explain to us how the Dawkinsian Blind Watchmaker evo mat view accounts successfully, step by step, on evidence, for the human linguistic capacity.
For, unlike ID — a specifically minimalist theme on detecting design as causative factor on empirically reliable signs thereof, it claims to be a successful and complete account of origins of life forms.
GEM of TKI
17
kairosfocus
04/21/2011
7:47 am
Alfred Russel Wallace
18
KL
04/21/2011
7:50 am
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
“For, unlike ID — a specifically minimalist theme on detecting design as causative factor on empirically reliable signs thereof..”
That’s exactly what I am asking you to do here, applied to the hominid fossil record. So, let’s have it.
I now have 4 posts in moderation, all parts of a conversation. To an onlooker this thread must look pretty goofy.
|
