paragwinn
Posts: 539
Joined: Mar. 2008
|
James Grover introduces the concept of introspection to UD:
| Quote | | I noted that there never seems to be any substantive criticism of ID hypotheses from pro-ID observers |
| Quote | | Don’t you consider this odd? How can science be done in the absence of substantive disagreement or constant, unwavering acquiescence? [corrected to "in the absence of substantive disagreement or in a state of constant, unwavering acquiescence?” in his next comment - paragwinn] |
StephenB performs a magic trick in the style of Bullwinkle the Moose:
"Hey, James, watch me pull a mountain of conclusions out of my ass. Let me roll up my sleeve...Presto!"
| Quote | | More to the point, your questions are irrelevant. You ignore ID science, question the legitimacy of ID’s methods, and challenge its conclusions on the grounds that its members are too palsy walsy. |
It's a slow news day.
--------------
All women build up a resistance [to male condescension]. Apparently, ID did not predict that. -Kristine 4-19-11
F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc. The whole thing is F/N ridiculous -Seversky on KF footnote fetish 8-20-11
Sigh. Really Bill? - Barry Arrington
|
