dvunkannon
Posts: 1377
Joined: June 2008
|
| Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Feb. 22 2011,01:10) | Joseph is dazzling the crowd.
| Quote | 3
Joseph
02/21/2011
10:18 am
Allegedly 90% of the genes are for every day stuff and 10% are for development.
The point being is I would expect a great deal of similarity, even to the point of being identical, in the vast majority of genes- ie that 90%.
That said there isn’t any evidence that organisms are a sum of their genes.
We just don’t know what makes a chimp a chimp nor a human a human beyond the obvious- a human baby is born of human parents and a chimp baby is born from chimp parents.
Also we don’t know of any mechanism(s) capable of producing the transformations required. |
piss why even pretend that you could provide a caption for that |
Joe seems to have forgotten being schooled on this subject by Nakashima, here
[URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/ic-all-the-way-down-the-grand-human-evolutionary-discontinuity-and-probabilistic-resources
/]http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....sources[/URL]
Including Nak's thread concluding limerick
| Quote | Rabbit egg + human DNA,
combined in a particular way
= human stem cells,
the contradiction of Wells,
and the limerick of Nakashima! |
I love it so!
--------------
I’m referring to evolution, not changes in allele frequencies. - Cornelius Hunter
I’m not an evolutionist, I’m a change in allele frequentist! - Nakashima
|
