Louis
Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
| Quote (Seversky @ Jan. 27 2011,13:20) | | Quote (dvunkannon @ Jan. 27 2011,06:57) | | Quote (CeilingCat @ Jan. 26 2011,06:38) | Man, Gordon is really outdoing himself in his last two postings, ID Foundations 2 - Counterflow and [URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/id-foundations-3-irreducible-complexity-as-concept-as-fact-as-macro-evolution-obstacle-and
-as-sign-of-design/]ID Foundations 3[/URL].
It's not so much that the OP for '-3' is six pages long or that the bottom of the page says "[Continues here]", it's that when you go to "here", you get another eight pages of drivel.
Now THAT is tard!
Even worse, I have a sick feeling that if I was to look even farther back into the tardpile I would find entry -1 in the series. |
The amazing thing to me is that KF soldiers on with his FIASCO musings, with never a response fom DDrr.., positive of negative. Does KF realize that he is not taken seriously by the man he tries to emulate? |
We could argue that UD needs more like KF and BA77. If anything ID has to say is buried in long, dense screeds that nobody can be bothered to read then so much the better. It is finished from the moment people's eyes start to glaze over at the very mention of the name. |
I've got (ok well I had) no problem with reading long, dense screeds from the IDCists. After all, the occasional long, dense screed contains something useful. Books are long and occasionally dense, for example. ;-)
However, what I do object to vigorously are long, dense, useful-information-free, logically incoherent, factually incorrect, strawman raising, pig ignorant screeds that are little more than dog whistles to evangelical religious idiots who think reality is somehow their enemy.
Since that is what the IDCist crowd now turns out exclusively, there's not much point keeping abreast of their drivel beyond the occasional skim to see if anything new has turned up (it hasn't). Once the IDCists had been determined as being warmed over creationists of the old school, what more effort was needed? Already read, already refuted. Why waste the time (beyond, you know, the LULZ)? All this happened conclusively...oooooh, when was Dover? Yeah, quite a while before that. ;-)
Louis
--------------
Bye.
|
