IBelieveInGod
Posts: 68
Joined: Nov. 2010
|
| Quote (phhht @ Jan. 09 2011,08:27) | | Quote (IBelieveInGod @ Jan. 09 2011,08:09) | Let me add to my previous post. If one were to state that once there was no biological life on earth, then that statement would be true, but that wasn't the question.
To state that once there was no life, one would have to have complete knowledge, which clearly is impossible, therefore to make such a statement would be a false statement. |
OK, I'll qualify the statements to read
1. Once there was no biological life on earth.
2. Now there is.
You apparently accept both statements. Yet you maintain that abiogenesis is "impossible."
Then you must redefine abiogenesis to mean something other than the
creation of life from non-living matter. Right? So what does "abiogenesis" really mean? Enlighten me, Poofster. |
I believe that God created life, therefore I believe that Abiogenesis (life arose from non-life by natural causes without the aid of a Creator) is wrong. You can't get around the fact that it is not KNOWN, how life actually came to be, therefore it would be a type of belief, for one to accept any way that life may have come into existence.
Now let me ask you this just for arguments sake (I don't believe this), but what if life came to earth from somewhere else in the universe? Are you certain that didn't happen?
|
