sparc
Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007
|
| Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Jan. 07 2011,18:19) | Oh, the splendor that is UD.
On January 6:
| Quote | Does Gene Duplication Perform As Advertised?
Jonathan M
In my previous post, I highlighted a recent peer-reviewed paper which challenged a key tenet of neo-Darwinian evolution — specifically, the causal sufficiency of gene duplication and subsequent divergence to account for the origin of novel biological information… |
On January 7:
| Quote | All Hail Peer Review!?
PaV
…While it appears that Wakefield falsified medical histories of children (and apparently to aid and abet some trial lawyers who paid him nearly $675,000 so that they could go after Big Pharma), stories like these genuinely undermine the notion that a peer reviewed article has any added credibility—something our Darwinian critics insist is true. |
Do you nitwits...
Oh, never mind. |
Asking the same question Grass caused one of BA77's tard explosions that keep me following UD.
--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."
- William Dembski -
|
