MadPanda, FCD
Posts: 267
Joined: Nov. 2010
|
Face it: we're dealing with someone who can't tell the difference between an evidence based statement that includes incredulity and the 'argument from incredulity' logical fallacy.
In fact, we're dealing with someone who can't tell the difference between a psychotic break and communion with his imaginary friend! (Remember what he said he'd do if his god ordered it?)
I doubt he's even capable of having an intelligent and civil conversation over, say, whether or not the Analects of Confucius offer a superior moral and ethical model for society than Biggy's favorite magic book. Not that utter ignorance of the Analects would stop him from spewing...
The MadPanda, FCD
--------------
"No matter how ridiculous the internet tough guy, a thorough mocking is more effective than a swift kick to the gentleman vegetables with a hobnailed boot" --Louis
|
