RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (501) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 3, The Beast Marches On...< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Hermagoras



Posts: 1260
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 11 2010,09:11   

Gotta love the way San Antonio Rose is driving KF to greater and greater levels of insanity.  I especially love this:    
Quote
Oh, KF, don’t be so prickly. We are all friends here. Answer two questions for me:

1. You want to strengthen marriage and family. Yes or no?

2. You feel stopping gay marriage is part of that effort. Yes or no?

If you answer yes to both questions, then I haven’t twisted your words in comment 385. I have merely restated them in a way that you don’t like. You shouldn’t be all indignant because my writing style is more direct and less mellifluous than yours.

You still haven’t answered my question regarding what the negative consequences were in countries that have instituted gay marriage (Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, Spain and Sweden.) This is the fourth time I’ve asked.


Mention KF's writing style and you're sure to get responses like this:  
Quote
SAR:

You have now resorted to trivialising of correction of slander.

That, sadly, speaks volumes. this is a serious matter.

As to your repeated questions, what is substsantial in such has already been adequately answered by the undersigned and by others, including just above.

Let me put the matter this way: it is those who prpose a radical modification to a fundamental social institution who properly have the burden of proof that they will do more good than harm. Already, as previously noted, there is widespread sexual chaos, marital and family breakdown, as the MD addresses. The problem with the proposed homosexualisation of marriage is that it arguably will make the breakdown irreversible, by acting under colour of law.

On failing in that duty of showing that the proposal is genuinely progressive, the homosexualist advocates have subverted the language of “rights,” in a contgext where it is evident that for many of them, a right is little more than the imposition of the powerful.

That is a further threat to our civilisation.


In the words of Yul Brynner, "etcetera, etcetera, etcetera."

SAR, if you are actually a student, you have my vote for Class President (or whatev).  In any event, I doff my tard cap to you.

--------------
"I am not currently proving that objective morality is true. I did that a long time ago and you missed it." -- StephenB

http://paralepsis.blogspot.com/....pot.com

   
  15001 replies since Sep. 04 2009,16:20 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (501) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]