sir_toejam
Posts: 846
Joined: April 2005
|
*rubs hands together like monty burns*
eeexxccelllenntt...
lol.
Thanks, that's quite helpful. I'm barely scratching the surface here, but I still would guess that somebody HAS tried this angle before. It's so rare that a truly new legal argument of this nature appears.
do you have the full reference to Eysenck, 2004?
also do you have other source materials you would recommend I check out to get a better background in this area?
I'm an ichthyologist/behavioral ecologist; my background in psych is pretty much limited to a one year undergrad course, and those bits and pieces directly related to classic ethology.
thanks
I sent you a PM; check your inbox.
|
