sparc
Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007
|
| Quote (REC @ Oct. 01 2010,15:57) | Sal could use a lesson in reading comprehension, honesty, or both.
His first post takes a paper that claims that because humans in industrialized comfy societies aren't exposed to the selective pressures they were in the past, we're headed for genetic catastrophe.
Link
This clearly falsifies what?
In the second, a long-term experiment where Drosophila were selectively bred (evolving novel traits!), scientists were surprised to find the evolved alleles didn't fix (become 100%). Sal advises us this falsifies Darwinism.
Link
My guess is Sal doesn't know what fixation means. He defines it as "Newly appearing good traits in a single individual will rarely get infused (or “fixed” ) into a population" and then goes on about likelyhoods of positive alleles evolving. Dumb. Didn't read the paper, did you? Anyway, there are a number of reasons why alleles might emerge, but not fix-vigor of a heterozygote, advantage of maintaining diversity, gene flow, etc....
And he is the most grotesquely self-congratulating idiot I've ever seen. My prediction confirmed in Nature, read it and weep. What a jackass.... |
Since the "m" in experimetal was lost your second link is dead. Here's the correct one.
--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."
- William Dembski -
|
