Mark Frank
Posts: 46
Joined: May 2006
|
| Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Sep. 19 2010,07:23) | I'd press him* to explain what he meant in 315:
| Quote | | As it turns out, the terms, whole, part, and greater cannot be defined as elemts of a self evident truth. |
He many times, ex-cathedra, included the part-whole relationship in his panoply of self-evident truths and rules of right reason. Now the above "turns out." Habemus papa?
*unless you don't want to enter a state of eternal bannination. If that's the case, forget it. |
On second thoughts I haven't the stomach for another round on this subject. But thanks anyway.
|
