Maya
Posts: 702
Joined: Dec. 2007
|
Upright Biped continues to amaze.
Petrushka asks him for a reference to Allen MacNeill's original comments:
| Quote | | Quote | | Now, want to have some real fun? Address my post at 589. |
could you provide a link to the statement paraphrased at 589? |
Upright Biped responds with . . . more paraphrasings:
| Quote | #19
Upright BiPed
04/21/2010
2:52 pm
. . .
Upright BiPed
04/22/2010
8:52 pm
. . .
Upright BiPed
04/23/2010
9:12 am
. . .
Upright BiPed
04/24/2010
6:35 am
. . .
Upright BiPed
04/25/2010
12:09 pm
. . .
Upright BiPed
04/26/2010
7:47 am
. . .
Upright BiPed
04/27/2010
10:59 am
. . .
Upright BiPed
05/01/2010
3:06 pm
. . .
|
Since we know you're listening, Clivebaby, you might want to let Upright Biped know that one quote from the original source is much more valuable than eight from the person paraphrasing him.
ETA: Allen MacNeill's comment is here. What he really said was:
| Quote | | Information, which as I have pointed out in many past threads, is neither reducible to the material and/or energy by which it is encoded nor possible without a material and/or energetic medium. |
What Upright Biped claimed he said is:
| Quote | | I appreciate that you see information as a causal force that is not reducible to material/energy. |
Is misrepresenting your opponent considered "civil" at UD, Clivebaby?
|
