Albatrossity2
Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007
|
| Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ July 11 2010,18:41) | Timaeus, one of UD's more articulate ID advocates:
| Quote | | Regarding the possible co-operation between Biologos and ID, I think that in the final analysis it boils down to this: if Biologos is intellectually committed not only to “evolution” but to the specifically neo-Darwinian model of evolution, or to any model of evolution which depends fundamentally on chance to generate novel forms, then there is no hope of any co-operation between the two. ID’s whole raison d’etre is to show the massive implausibility of an evolutionary process that proceeds in this way. ID could not surrender its Darwin-skepticism without ceasing to be itself. |
IOW, ID makes no positive assertions, and it is not really its mission to do so.
Don't you get banned over there for saying that? |
Sweet. The next time some IDiot says that ID is more than just evolution-bashing, I'll point him to this.
Wonder how long it will be up there, though...
--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
- Pattiann Rogers
|
