oldmanintheskydidntdoit
Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006
|
Evolution is a lie because if it were true everything that could have evolved should have evolved. At least I think that's what Jerry is trying to say:
| Quote | There is absolutely nothing in the fossil record that supports a Darwinian mechanism. Yes, there is the appearance of new forms but nothing points to a gradual mechanism as its driver.
The fact that one points to the inner ear is an admission of weakness. There must have been millions of transitions and this is all one has. There is no obvious mechanism for these changes. In the whales there are large gaps and no evidence of all the side branches that must exist in a Darwinian scenario.
Every step is viable (and there are theoretically thousands of steps) and then each step can theoretically branch in many directions and we should thus witness branches that are several levels of magnitude greater in number than exist in the fossil record and also in the current suite of organisms on the earth. The absence of these branches indicates that the process did not work this way or that there was something within the organism that propelled it in specific directions. Either finding disproves Darwinian processes and most likely any naturalistic process.
Micro evolution operates to refine species in small ways but there is nothing in the fossil record to indicate it can build complex novel characteristics nor is there anything in the current species on earth today to indicate such a capability.
The fact that no one can provide it is telling and I often ask where does Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne do so in their books. These are two of the modern disciples of Darwin and they cannot do it.
|
No obvious mechanism apart from ID I guess. Obvious to Jerry anyway.
--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings
|
