didymos
Posts: 1828 Joined: Mar. 2008
|
Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ May 20 2010,20:25) | Quote | StephenB 05/20/2010 9:06 am
My how quickly you catch on. The entire debate is centered around the self-serving nature of that standard. |
|
*boggle* Requiring a theory to be actually good for something is "self-serving"? What the fuck does he think you can accomplish with untestable "theories"?
Man, and I thought Cornelius publicly declaring that he's not a creationist despite that being a condition of his employment was stupid.
-------------- I wouldn't be bothered reading about the selfish gene because it has never been identified. -- Denyse O'Leary, professional moron Again "how much". I don't think that's a good way to be quantitative.-- gpuccio
|