didymos
Posts: 1828
Joined: Mar. 2008
|
| Quote (JLT @ May 18 2010,10:37) | In response to Cassandra trying to get Batshitinsane77 to address criticism of Behe's malaria calculations by Nick Matzke:
|
Speaking of Nick, he dropped by Cornelius' blog last night to deliver a thrashing in three parts:
Part the First
Part the Second
Part the Third
A highlight:
| Quote | | As for why get into this -- I think it would save everyone a lot of time if we just cut to the heart of the issues. You think the ultimate arbiter of truth is the Bible. We think it's empirical evidence. But, probably because you know you'd lose if you just said what you actually thought about the Bible and its role in all of this, you come up with meandering, unconvincing, and totally arbitrary and self-inconsistent ways to attempt to accuse evolutionists of being unempirical and based on religion. But it's all just a silly game you're playing to distract from the real issues. All I can do is point it out. |
--------------
I wouldn't be bothered reading about the selfish gene because it has never been identified. -- Denyse O'Leary, professional moron
Again "how much". I don't think that's a good way to be quantitative.-- gpuccio
|
