Paul Flocken
Posts: 290
Joined: Dec. 2005
|
| Quote (bjray @ April 24 2010,15:44) | | 2) Carbon dating. Accurate only to a few thousand years, as scientists have calculated. So, when said dinosaur bones were carbon dated and not linked to the millions of years evolutionists preconceived, eh, throw out the carbon dating; doesn't fit our theory. |
Do you really wish to claim that Carbon14 is the only form of radiometric dating available to scientists.
I won't be the only person to point out to you that ID allegedly does not have a problem with radiometric dating. Only Young-Earth Creationists do. Are you willing to be painted as such?
This is the level of distortion (the politest word I want to use) they commit themselves to in order to discredit science in the minds of laypeople.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v4/n3/radiometric-dating
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v4/n4/assumptions
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v5/n1/patterns
--------------
"The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie--deliberate, contrived, and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."-John F. Kennedy
|
