FloydLee
Posts: 577
Joined: Sep. 2009
|
No mention about the latest edition of Glencoe Biology and its sanitized, missing-mechanism RNA World presentation, eh?
Again, the point is simply that you evolutionists don't require a scientific hypothesis to have a mechanism, when it suits you.
You'll accept it as science, you'll teach it in high school biology class, in fact you're doing that in each of my hometown's high schools right this very minute (they all use Glencoe, for example.)
So, stay with the point please: why the double standard? Why insist that the ID hypothesis must be mechanistic, when you don't even follow that principle with your own "Somehow" chemical evolution hypothesis (-ses)?
|
