Albatrossity2
Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007
|
| Quote (FloydLee @ April 15 2010,09:51) | That's your OOL life from-nonlife mechanism, effectively: "Somehow."
So, you DO accept hypotheses as scientific WITHOUT having or knowing of any mechanism. |
1 - That's not a hypothesis if you use the scientific definition of the word (proposed explanation for an observed phenomenon) rather than the creationist distortion of the word (wild-ass guess).
2 - There are testable hypotheses that address the question of the origin of life. These are used as the basis of scientific papers. So even though there is no scientific consensus about abiogenesis, there is actual scientific work being done.
So can you give us a testable hypothesis about how your god made a rock, much less a living cell? Can you direct us to the scientific papers that describe the results of testing these hypotheses?
chirp chirp chip
--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
- Pattiann Rogers
|
