fnxtr
Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006
|
| Quote (Amadan @ April 01 2010,03:09) | Incredible article in Wissenschaftlich Zeitung für betruglichen Forderungen. Excuse my rough translation:
| Quote | WZbF: It has been alleged that the Intelligent Design postulate is essentially a political strategy under the guise of scientific language.
Dembski: That is tendentious. What we are seeking is to restore the practice of science to what we have identified, with great precision, as its Aristotelian ideal. That political consequences would flow from this is secondary, though undoubtedly to be desired. In a sense, we are seeking to destroy science in order to save it. |
Full article available here. |
Erm, that wouldn't be today's edition by any chance, would it? Hard to tell with IDiots.
--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory
"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night." Joe G
|
