CeilingCat
Posts: 2363
Joined: Dec. 2007
|
| Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Mar. 21 2010,11:40) | | Quote (midwifetoad @ Mar. 21 2010,12:15) | | Quote | | Yes, and it isn’t selection. As in so many cases, it is an adaptation to an environmental shift. |
That might be the dumbest thing I've seen in print. |
I don't see any problem with it. He is saying that environmental conditions resulted in differential rates of survival and reproduction, resulting in the observed changes.
Not natural selection. |
Yeah, come on you guys, show a little respect! After all, Cornelius has library privileges at the Bible Institute Of Los Angeles. You're dealing with an intellect that far, far exceeds your puny mortal capabilities.
C'mon, Corney, tell us again how 2+2=4 is only true for certain God-ordained values of 2. And "4" is in the Bible, so it's scientific, for a certain God-ordained value of "scientific".
|
