RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (3) < [1] 2 3 >   
  Topic: IS empiricism a natural part of pattern recognitio< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
BWE



Posts: 1902
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 03 2010,12:12   

Quote (sledgehammer @ Mar. 03 2010,10:03)
Quote (BWE @ Mar. 03 2010,08:42)
In the last 5 years, the world changed. Learning algorithms are commonplace, there are dozens of computer models of neural networks which function exactly as they would be expected to, and embodied intelligence has crossed the hurdle of creativity.

If you want a good place to start,
http://www.umass.edu/neuro/faculty/files/siegelmann.html

EDIT: No link on that page to her publications. If you actually care, here is that link:
http://binds.cs.umass.edu/publications.html

this lady has some interesting math she has been working on for quite some time. The list however, is nearly endless.

Impressive. The work she's doing is real bioinformatics, with practical applications to real-world problems like addiction and circadian responses.  Her "Active Information" is on a completely different level from the crap produced by the Evolutionary Informatics "lab" of Dembski, Marks, Sewell and Dodgen.

Regards to randomness, from her 1998 paper "Neural Dynamics With Stochasticity"    
Quote
Randomness is a basic characteristic of large distributed systems. It may result from the activity of the individual agents, from unpredictable changes in the communication pattern among the agents, or even just from the different update paces ... Our particular stochastic model can be seen as an incorporation of the von Neumann model of unreliable interconnections of components to the area of neural networks: the basic component has a fixed probability for malfunction.

The last is a particularly apt description of my brain, except for the "fixed probability" part  :p

This one here:
http://binds.cs.umass.edu/papers/2008_Olsen_AI.pdf

Is one which I've written a little about in other places.  But yes. This is the actual state of the discipline. The issue of quantum consciousness is outdated. The real research has moved on and, like I said, AI is already a reality. Within a decade we will likely have self-awareness from a silicone base.

The difference between now and 5 years ago is the difference between Einstein and Faraday.

--------------
Who said that ev'ry wish would be heard and answered
When wished on the morning star
Somebody thought of that, and someone believed it
Look what it's done so far

The Daily Wingnut

   
  72 replies since Feb. 23 2010,07:04 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (3) < [1] 2 3 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]