Louis
Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
| Quote (ERV @ Feb. 22 2010,02:09) | | Quote (Daevans @ Feb. 21 2010,03:07) | | I don't believe evolution is a complete picture or that everything about evolutionary theory has been satisfactorily explained. I would even say from what we know the Genome might hold some of those answers. |
Like What?
Feel free to Be as Technical as you like, 'medical Student'.
Do you think Alu elements are Evidences for Creation?
Are you a moron? |
LOL "Be as technical as you like". Tee hee hee. Oh I'll take £100 on no technical ability beyond "cut and paste" or maybe "slight reword of cut and paste".
Ah, my cynicism, it's acting up again. Maybe this new chum really is the one with the oft touted-never seen "Fallacy Free Creationist Argument". After all, asking about increasing genomic information is really rare. I've never heard that one before. No, really. I'll also bet that a consistent definition of "information" from our new chum will take some time to come forth. I'll bet that even when it does emerge the standard equivocation with woolly terms like "meaning" accompany it.
I am also tickled pink by the sanctimonious instruction that a theory of such import needs examining because otherwise accepting it with all its faults and inexactitude is irresponsible. Wow. This is such a novel concept. I'll run off and tell all my colleagues about it immediately. No other scientist I've ever talked to has ever thought of examining current theories with a sceptical eye and some intellectual rigour. This will revolutionise the world! I predict we scientists will get right on this.
Louis
ETA Because this cannot be used enough:
--------------
Bye.
|
