RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (4) < [1] 2 3 4 >   
  Topic: Randomness versus Purpose, a Discussion, Exploring some provoked thoughts< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 13 2010,14:28   

Quote (Thought Provoker @ Feb. 13 2010,08:39)
Hi fnxtr,
         
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 13 2010,01:39)
(shrug) Some would say it is. "Since everything is but an apparition..." etc.

That is a presumption some people have.

Is that your presumption?

After much contemplation I have come to the conclusion that I don't know. It's a possibility, I know of no way to verify it.

     
Quote
       
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 13 2010,01:39)
Everything in moderation, then? (Or maybe just a moderate number of things in moderation, everything in moderation seems a bit extreme)

:D I like it.


(bows)

       
Quote
       
Quote (fnxtr @ Feb. 13 2010,01:39)
There are limits to all freedoms, aren't there?

As far as I can tell, I can choose which shirt to wear but I can't choose to teleport to work.  

Quantum indeterminacy has limited probabilites, dunnit?

Does that mean you are presuming quantum indeterminacy might be involved in choosing shirts?

Or at least consider it a possibility?



If someone could should how quantum indeterminacy ... er... determines... which of my neurons are more likely to fire in a given circumstance, I'd consider it. At the moment it doesn't seem likely.  And yes I think we're purely physical creatures, but calling that "just chemistry" misses much sublime richness.

I'm saying there are parallels between the two, in that all 'freedoms' are limited.

The image I have used before is a kite on the string in the wind, blown around in turbulence but held within limits by the string (no i'm not going to talk about sting theory, that's way over my head. I mean a metaphorical kite string).

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
  97 replies since Feb. 11 2010,17:03 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (4) < [1] 2 3 4 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]