MichaelJ
Posts: 462
Joined: June 2009
|
| Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Feb. 07 2010,04:19) | StephenB proves ID is science. ID answers questions!
| Quote | By this standard, we can easily make sense of one of the many questions that the methodological naturalists cannot answer or even dare approach.
For the MN’s, a burglar [or an ancient hunter constructing a spear, or an ancient engineer building Pompeii] that is motivated by a material brain is a natural cause, while a burglar/hunter/engineer motivated by an immaterial mind is a supernatural cause, except of course that, for them, immaterial minds don’t exist, so never mind the supernatural cause after all. How can those who embrace such a proposition keep a straight face?
For ID, everything falls into place. A burglar, by definition, is simply an example of an intelligent agent of the human variety. |
Got that? It's all so simple with ID! |
I don't get it. What is it that we are afraid to ask or answer?
|
