oldmanintheskydidntdoit
Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006
|
| Quote (Utunumsint @ Jan. 29 2010,09:06) | | No new evolutionary function over this very prolongued conflict with malaria has evolved on the human side.... |
The question you have to ask yourself is could malaria be any more successful then it already is?
Malaria has had a very long time to evolve, yes. And yet it's still malaria.
| Quote | | Each year, there are approximately 350–500 million cases of malaria,[1] killing between one and three million people, |
In what way would malaria need to step outside of it's niche to continue to be successful? Why would you expect it to change significantly given how successful it is? Seems to me this "still just malaria" is doing just fine.
Are you Dave Scot?
--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings
|
