oldmanintheskydidntdoit
Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006
|
Jerry:
| Quote | | And a series of events have the same probability as all the events happening at once. I gave you the rationale for that. Yes the odds of winning the lottery twice is different if you once won the lottery but it begs the question of how did you win the first lottery. |
...
| Quote | | The whole discussion of complete genomes was a joke, started by a clown and I humored him by providing a list to let the absurdity play out. Do you understand it was a way of showing up this clown as a clown. But some people seemed to think it was serious. And I did give a serious attempt by listing some criteria that would be the basis of a discussion. But the criteria were not FSCI specifically and I pointed out reasons for it not being appropriate. Any serious attempt at this would never be FSCI. It is not necessary. |
Yep, It is not necessary to compute FSCI as "it's obvious" it exists. ID science in a nutshell. In fact, you could probably fit "ID science" in a literal nutshell.
Jerry, logically if FSCI has been computed for more then 1 item it's possible to order those items by FSCI. There is no such list.
--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings
|
