Reg
Posts: 112
Joined: Dec. 2008
|
Oooh, Barry's bringing his razor-sharp lawyerly insight to the thread and presenting clear evidence that Cochrane really does think Mengele-style experimenting on live humans is okay after all. No, sorry, my mistake:
| Quote | | Mark Frank and waterbear, your comments are absurd. The whole point of Cochrane’s article is to contest the dignity criterion. You can participate in this discussion if you have something reasonable to say. You cannot, however, come in here and say “black is white.” |
Gotcha, because that answers the question.
I also love how saying “black is white” on UD is wrong, but saying “questioning and trying to define ethical criteria is the same as wanting live human guinea pigs” is apparently fine.
And is it just me, or is Barry's comment some kind of bannination threat?
--------------
"Even though I am not a creationist by any reasonable definition ... the Cambrian explosion was doubtless the work of God in my view but I would say that of all creation." - Denyse O'Leary, Oct 17, 2009.
|
