Kristine
Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006
|
| Quote (sparc @ Dec. 14 2009,21:30) | | Quote (Bob O'H @ Dec. 14 2009,15:35) | Sorry, providing links is a bit of a pain on my iPhone. But I've either made a design inference or a lucky guess. I just went through the conference programme for the meeting where Marks presented his stuff. And guess who one of the session chairs was? (hint: not WmAD)
Wes or someone knows the comp. Sci. area better - would the chair organise the reviews for the final version?
There was another chair, so Marks might have ensured that everything was above board, though, so there's no evidence for anything fishy.
The session was in T3, if anyone wants to go through the programme and check. It's in an excel sheet, of all things. |
Actually it was T4. It's listed between line 64 and line 72 of the EXCEL sheet.
I guess what's quite telling is that Dembski is not mentioned in the authors list: | Quote |
Rm8(Computational Intelligence IV) Session Chair(s) Henry Chu/ Bob Marks II
Paper ID Paper Title Authors
995 Evolutionary Synthesis of Nand Logic: Dissecting a Digital Organism Winston J. Ewert, Bob Marks II
|
Seems Dr. Dr. Dembski's name is notorious even in those engineers circles.
ETA: The good doctor's name neither appears in the printed version of the program (page 132 of the pdf) |
The other chair (Sam Yuan Sung) also presented his own paper, and has written papers with others listed in the session. (Here.) I wonder what he would say about the process. He seems to be completely unconnected to ID. Did he judge Marks’ paper while Marks recused himself, and visa versa? I wonder if he’s aware of the confetti-throwing at UD over this paper and of the inclusion of Dembski as author.
--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?
AtBC Poet Laureate
"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive
"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr
|
