Jim_Wynne
Posts: 1208
Joined: June 2006
|
| Quote (inquiry @ Dec. 11 2009,10:04) | | Quote (Robin @ Dec. 11 2009,09:05) | | So you understand what you are asking, Inquiry, fish to amphibian would be a completely new class - waaaay beyond merely a change in "kind" or "species". It's no wonder you don't understand or accept evolution - you think it about changes at levels that evolution doesn't speak to. |
So in other words there is no evidence to support the idea of macroevolution? |
I always use this to answer the stupid micro=good, macro=no way:
From our friends at Jesus and Mo
--------------
Evolution is not about laws but about randomness on happanchance.--Robert Byers, at PT
|
