Zachriel
Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006
|
| Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Nov. 24 2009,08:39) | ROFL@Joseph
| Quote | | Shannon does not deal with “information” per se. |
Read it and weep. |
Mustela Nivalis pleads for a concise definition of information, to no avail. It's his weeping that you hear. Of course, Shannon is regarded as the father of information theory, but what does he know.
This also demonstrates, once again, the unitary ID argumentology—equivocation. Imagine trying to discuss the nested hierarchy with vague and faulty notions of sets or classification. Nevermind. Forget I mentioned it.
--------------
You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.
|
