didymos
Posts: 1828
Joined: Mar. 2008
|
Dembski continues to act like a creepy Dawkins-stalker: | Quote |
Some evolutionists are thoughtful and measured, willing to admit the anomalies that evolutionary theory must still explain. Richard Dawkins is not one of them. Instead, he seems to inhabit a la-la land where all the conceptual difficulties connected with the evolutionary theory are resolved or swept under the rug. As one colleague who wishes to remain out of the limelight wrote to a list I moderate: [snip bunch of crap]
|
A colleague on your super-ninja-secret ID list. Suuuuurrre. Bill, he just doesn't like you that way: move the fuck on, you weasel. You ain't gettin' no Dick, no how.
--------------
I wouldn't be bothered reading about the selfish gene because it has never been identified. -- Denyse O'Leary, professional moron
Again "how much". I don't think that's a good way to be quantitative.-- gpuccio
|
